Discussion in 'Conspiracies' started by Gawdzilla Sama, Dec 3, 2017.
Repeating the word "proof" a hundred times doesn't make it proof.
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
We should not suffer fools gladly. Sorry, Freddy.
What makes it not exist in the first place is that you are misusing the word 'proof'.
Your own definition of 'playing dumb' says 'evidence and logical argument'. Those aren't proof.
Not to put too fine a point in it but I was not claiming your arguments were complete bunk, nor did I reject the arguments and evidence. I simply corrected your erroneous use of the word 'proof'. They have not been proven. You overstate your case, and shoot yourself in the foot.
It's convenient that conspiracy advocates offer themselves as examples.
No objective thinking person who takes the time to look at it will agree with you.
We may have to start talking about details.
If we pretend to agree with him, perhaps he'll go away and find new people to convince.
Demonstrably false, since generally, most objective, thinking people don't subscribe to those conspiracies.
But if you only would LISTEN! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
The only way to resolve this is to talk about the actual "Proof" in question.
How much of the info that I've posted about these two subjects have you people looked at?
When you first starting posting I looked a couple and since then I have looked at none. Those couple of post told me all I needed to know about your ability to assess the accuracy of what you link as 'proof'.
Fat, you know it's not about "proof". Facts don't matter to a conspiracy advocate.
So says every "true" Scotsman.
"No objectional quasi-thinking person who fakes having looked at it will agree with anything other than what they already believe.."
Come over to the 9/11 thread and adddress the post I made there. Here's a link to the post.
Ok. Address it here.
Why? Your confabulations have rendered you oblivious to reason.
You didn't make any point over there. All you did was point to a video. Don't assume that a video that convinced you is going to convince everybody else.
That's the problem with conspiracy advocates. Half the time, I don't think they even understand their own claptrap. They're just parroting catch-phrases.
If you really understand your "theories", you should be able to express them in your own words and not expect a video to do it for you.
What's shown in that video is such clear proof that the government planned and carried out the 9/11 attack that if I try to obfuscate it, I'll just look silly.
Evidence is evidence. Who presents it is irrelevant. Please address the argument.
You have an appalling lack of judgment, so bad that you can't declare anything "proof".
Separate names with a comma.