Of course, not. You tried to redefine the words so that nobody can refute you. It's your standard go-to in every debate: post something patently absurd and/or incorrect, then when you're called out backtrack by trying to redefine commonly-understood words to mean something ridiculous. Oh, very helpful. A human being is a human being. You can't actually define "human being", can you, Jan? Not specifically. The fact is, human beings are what people recognise as such. That's the best we can do. Methods of recognition vary. Think about it. Medical studies. You know. Medical doctors study medicine. Right. And a significant portion of the ones who deny the science do so for religious reasons, just like you do.