Do photons have inertia?

Discussion in 'Physics & Math' started by Literphor, Apr 5, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Literphor I is for ignorance Registered Member

    Messages:
    55
    I couldn't find a clear answer to this question, so please enlighten me. My understanding right now is it does not.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    They have no inertia, because they are massless. They do have momentum, a measure of energy, which is independent of mass.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Big Chiller Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,106
    @AlexG


    Mass is a form of energy, just saying.​
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    No.

    Mass is equivalent to energy, but that's not saying they're the same thing.
     
  8. Big Chiller Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,106
    @AlexG


    I'll say it clearer for you then mass is a form of energy there are other forms energy such as electromagnetic radiation but electromagnetic radiation and mass are NOT the same thing, they are all classed under energy.​
     
  9. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    Then let me say it clearer to you.

    You're wrong.

    Mass and energy are not the same things, thay are not all classed under energy. There is an equivalence of mass and energy, but they're not the same things.

    Is that clear enough?
     
  10. Big Chiller Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,106
    @AlexG


    I of course disagree with your comment according to mainstream understanding. Equivalence of mass-energy is just a technical phrase it's really equivalence of electromagnetic radiation-mass.​
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2012
  11. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    And I, of course, continue to disagree with yours.
     
  12. Big Chiller Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,106
    @AlexG


    Your disagreement is backed by what?​
     
  13. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,643
    Mass and energy are not the same thing.

    \( E \not= M\)

    There is an equivilancy:

    \( E = Mc^2\)

    Force:

    \( F = ma\)

    \( F\not=Ea\)
     
  14. Big Chiller Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,106
    @origin


    Note the equivalency in the famous equation is between electromagnetic radiation (not energy) and mass in actuality.​
     
  15. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    37,600
    Sorry, but that's wrong.

    \(E=mc^2\) says that any object with mass \(m\) can, in principle, be converted into an amount of energy \(E\), or vice-versa. There is no restriction to electromagnetic radiation.
     
  16. Big Chiller Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,106
    @James R


    All I'm saying is that E which represents energy in physics is electromagnetic radiation and that in actuality both electromagnetic radiation and mass are forms of energy.​
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2012
  17. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    37,600
    There are other forms of energy other than electromagnetic energy, Big Chiller. The symbol E is often used for these other forms of energy.
     
  18. Big Chiller Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,106
    @James R


    Agreed and also mass is one of those forms but is distinguished from the other forms by the symbol E.
     
  19. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    Nope. It's already been pointed out that there are other forms of energy besides em, and mass is not a form of energy.

    You seem to think that 'equivalence' means 'the same thing as".
     
  20. Big Chiller Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,106
    @AlexG


    It's your assertion against my logical claim and fyi I don't think *equivalence* means the same thing as.​
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2012
  21. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    Ah, logic.

    Science works better.

    Try it sometime.
     
  22. Big Chiller Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,106
    @AlexG


    Excellent, deny all logic and rationality that scientific method is founded on as well as sidetrack from what was being discussed.​
     
  23. BWE1 Rulers are for measuring. Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    312
    Photons don't have inertia but they do have momentum.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page