Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by gamelord, Jul 3, 2018.
If you say so.
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
All the therapists I've encountered were usually single and been years since they been laid.
Women claim they want a man who treats them right and cares about their emotional needs, but really they want an alpha male, because they hate men who are weak.
And you know what therapists are? Weak. Non-violent. They advocate pacifism, non-violence, resolving conflicts the Jesus way. Pathetic.
But I want to go on to about the ancient times. In the ancient times, it is said that only 1 out of every 17 men could get laid. That is absolutely ridiculous. That level of oppression seems insane to believe. So, out of every 17 males, only 1 male gets to have a happy life. That seems retarded. I don't even know how such a society could function, all of the males in it would be angry and bitter and fight with each other constantly, so I doubts on these so called "historical facts". In any case, even if such historical records are fake, it is a useful illustration to demonstrate the problems of hypergamy: Women seeming to gravitate towards one man only, like Brad Pitt or Johnny Depp, for instance, and the rest of the males are discarded and forever alone, always encountering resistance and flak from women for even trying. Women always making up excuses, stating reasons why these males are just never good enough for them, and how they will never compare to Brad Pitt. So males get super competitive, try-hard, and bitter, in this infinite contest to try and prove their worth to an unattainable, infinite standard. And its a double standard because, if a male acted like how women do, they would be called a chauvinist. For instance, if a woman told me she loved me, and I said, "Nope. Can't date you, we can't have sex, because, you're just not as hot as Angelina Jolie. I only date girls as hot and as famous as Angelina Jolie." I would be called a chauvinist pig. But women can go around saying "Brad Pitt is my standard, you will never be able to reach his league" and then I am told things about how all I need to do is be rich and famous like Jim Beluci and women will love me, and I am supposed to accept this extreme form of misandry as "civilized" and "progressive".
You're smart enough to know your opinions leave out myriad factors affecting relationships. If you want to vent, go for it. I just fear to see this "incel" idea become more radicalized...
As for therapists being weak? I'm thinking of people that at least have a degree in psychology i.e. scientists. Not someone you call upon when you crying over spilled milk.
Other than that, get a hobby. Maybe start drinking, so you can wallow in self pity and feel sorry for yourself because on average it takes less beer for women to become intoxicated. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
For shame....Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Perhaps some people who are not violent are cowardly, but was Jesus a coward? Was someone like Martin Luther King jr a coward? Please do not confuse non violence with cowardice. This confusion is one of the reasons why we have overcompensating men in our society.
If you don't like that sort of behavior you shouldn't be doing it yourself, right? Instead of trying to fix the situation Incels are reveling in it. Hey look someone robbed me so I'm gonna rob someone else while complaining about how I got robbed. It's textbook hypocrisy.
Jesus, if he was real, was literally insane. And he was poisoning our population with certain values.
Like I get it. Roman crucifixions were savage and evil and needed to be stopped. And the jewish religion was morally bankrupt and corrupt. So Jesus did some good things. But at what point do we need to embrace Jesus's cultural ideals of total emasculation and servitude?
Like I said not all incels are the same. Eliot Rodgers was a fucking idiot and even bad a being a mass murderer. He litterally walked up to a sorority house rang the door bell and just walked away, instead of just breaking the glass door. And half of the people he killed were utter incels like himself, he was a buffoon. His idea of a utopia is a society with only men and no women, which is homo to the max.
And yes, people like Eliot Rodgers make us look bad, especially when he refuses to fuck any woman other that a 10, it makes me think he is a closet homo actually.
You don't need to be emasculated just because you aren't violent. you worry too much about what other people thinks about you because you believe you need sex. It just boils down to that.... How much respect would you have for someone if you noticed that they are constantly worried about what other people are thinking about them? I don't believe many people, male or female, finds that very attractive. Btw I only brought up Jesus to point out that non violence and cowardice are two separate things. If you want to talk about whether his ideals are bad for society or not, that's a whole different topic.
It is astonishing that your critique of him is not about his ideology and beliefs that led him to mass murder.. Nor the fact that his utopia was about making the beautiful women he felt owed him sex, pay for their crimes of not wanting him..
Because reasonable people would peg that. Not you though.
You are whining that he was too stupid to break through the glass door to murder the women inside the sorority house and instead walked away and murdered people in the street after murdering his room mate..
You strike me as a horrible little person. It seem to me you deserve all the unhappiness you are feeling.
That wouldn't be the greatest pick-up line...
i think this is the second time you have mentioned this.
you clearly have superior patience Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
are there any same sex incels ?
it sounds kinda like a developmental problem where the pubescent teen has suddenly been forced into a socialisation process after never being parented to a point where they have had to learn to not be selfish and self sufficient for their own happiness.
the lying 5 year old meets the 10 year old protester who trys to equate all socialisation with sexual themes...
and the fruedian link to the mother figure of authority
disliking the mother as a female authority and then the transferance of the efect to the male-female relationship as a form of blame transferance for lack of being able to cope with emotional life problems.
I think I should seriously consider suicide. My life sucks and I seriously suffer and I don't want to live like that forever.
All I can attract are ugly girls but no girl that I am even a little attracted to ever shows any interest in me.
I don't want to remain a lonely and psychotic virgin forever when I see other guys get married and they are happy and also many of them have good-looking girlfriends.
So I think that I should really find a way to kill myself because I just don't see a future for myself worth living.
I also have other problems in my life like trouble with the Israeli police and the Israeli law authorities.
My life is becoming very very difficult and sometimes unbearable and many times I don't know how much more I can continue to live.
Killing myself really seems to become my only option.
Mod Hat — Proviso
This isn't the best place for that kind of announcement.
1) IP data is unreliable, so we don't always know which police station to call in order to have someone check on your safety.
2) You're an example of such manners of vice and cruelty defining this site's market niche; even taking you deathly seriously, one wonders at shouting your frustration to an audience so dedicated to not giving a damn, as you already know that's how it goes around here.
3) There are people in this world who would prefer you continue to live, largely because they have an aesthetic doctrine against suicide. You're not giving us much to work with. No, really, it's like: Yeah, well, they're not pretty enough, that's your effin' problem.
I suppose this outcome is a result of stringing you along: Over the years, moderators have been expected to tank on misogyny in particular for the sake of site ownership and Administrative prerogative. There is a range of bad faith we're expected to accommodate, and, boy howdy, lemme tell ya, you should see what happens when we crash on rape advocacy and other misogyny.
No, seriously, the idea is that we're supposed to like having religious people and ufologists around in order to make examples of. Comparatively, we're supposed to go easy on rape advocates in order to be fair.
We see in people like you and Gamelord just how stupid an idea that is. Think of it this way: You're a tool. It's an interesting pathology, to threaten suicide because you perceive mere circumstance disrupting the fulfillment of your own greed. There is a curious behavior in bourgeois societies, and for all the seemingly ridiculous and cruel nonsense happening around Sciforums we finally come to this: A bully threatening suicide because he feels he cannot properly bully the people he really, really, really wants to hurt.
It feels almost inevitable.
I'm honestly uncertain just how much more blatant an example life can provide; to a certain degree some will distrust your suicidality. I admit, the fact that it is here, in this thread dedicated to blithering hyperbole and flaccid sleight, almost feels like regularly-scheduled tragidramedy. Still, though: Here we are.
And I do recommend Camus' The Myth of Sisyphus, which is a philosophical argument against suicide, but there is also the possibility that it won't help; the book reads like a burden and is only redeemed by its resolution, which in turn feels like a humor noir hook.
Live through this, as much as you can. Good luck.
Separate names with a comma.