Notre Dame Cathedral

Discussion in 'World Events' started by Tiassa, Apr 15, 2019.

  1. Tiassa Let us not launch the boat ... Staff Member

    Messages:
    35,891
    A few minutes ago I wandered upstairs, past the television droning msnbc, where the host was speaking via telephone with historian Elizabeth Lev, as they watched cycling footage of the burning Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris. The network host interrupted, explaining that word has just emerged from the French Ministry of the Interior that firefighters might not be able to save the Cathedral.

    The sound that emerged from Lev was that of shock. A weak and plaintive tone, and all she could say was, "What?" So the anchor repeated herself, and was greeted by fifteen seconds of silence before coaxing the art historian back to speech.

    Only a moment before, Lev had been trying to consider the future of Notre Dame, and in that moment it seemed to burn away.

    I'm waiting for certain information that we can't have now, because it remains necessarily unresolved. Meanwhile, circumstance can pique easy conspiracism: Everything else going on in France; Holy Week; fire started within minutes of facility evening closure; even as a construction accident, the idea that the whole complex was so firetrap hazardous seems absurd compared to its historical significance. So I'm waiting for reality to dispel that knot of suspicion.

    So I'm utterly uncertain what goes here, because at this point it's just a matter of waiting and watching and wondering what just happened.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Sarkus Hippomonstrosesquippedalo phobe Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,429
    Apparently they're a bit more optimistic about saving the building now... well, the stonework at least.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Yazata Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,171
    Hopefully. It doesn't look good.

    The way I hear it, the medieval construction methods left it with a lead sheet roof specifically designed to keep water out. That's supported by a wooden framework. All of that is over the stone arch roof that people see from inside. Over 800 years the wooden part of the structure got very dry and became a firetrap. If a fire started in there, started by a construction worker or something, the Paris firemen could spray all the water they like on the lead sheeting on one side or the stone on the other, and wouldn't reach the fire.

    And as the wood goes, the lead sheeting will collapse and maybe melt. If that brings down the stone arch below, then the whole building, whose forces were very carefully balanced by the builders, will likely come down.

    I'm not big on praying, but I really hope that as much of this structure and the art it contains survives as is possible. It is/was one of humanity's great treasures. Something like 800 years old.
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2019
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Tiassa Let us not launch the boat ... Staff Member

    Messages:
    35,891
    This starts to answer one of my questions. But the part that keeps nagging has to do with the idea of how the fire spread. I was never an actual professional in the insurance industry, working administrative services at the time, but, still, the idea of underwriting a project of that scale under circumstances when a small accidental fire can so quickly spread to the rest of the complex just grates against my understanding of a commerce sector so given to risk mitigation that, over seventy-five years ago, insurers consulted with death camp administrators to advise on safety equipment and protocols to reduce worker compensation claims among the soldiers loading corpses into ovens. It's not a stretch to imagine the underwriters and adjusters in the select risk division I worked for chattering their theses about what must have gone wrong and who failed to do what if this turns out to be a construction accident.
     
  8. Yazata Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,171
    It seems to me that they should have installed a gaseous fire-suppression system in the internal spaces, halon or something like that.

    That should still be done in other surviving medieval cathedrals in England, France and wherever, that have similar construction and vulnerabilities.
     
  9. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,619
    I agree with the comments above but I'm not sure I get the emphasis on the "lead roof specifically designed to keep water out". Aren't all roofs specifically designed to keep water out?

    I'm hoping for the best regarding the structure. They were able to get some art work and statutes out. The stone structure will probably be OK. The rest can be rebuilt I guess. It's too bad that it has to be rebuilt.

    You wouldn't think, with construction going on, that a fire suppression system would have already been installed. I'm sure there are legitimate reasons why this is hard to do.
     
    candy likes this.
  10. sculptor Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,169
    It seems likely that that will depend on the heat of the fire.
     
  11. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,619
    Everything depends on the fire of course but I've heard that the structure will largely survive.
     
  12. LaurieAG Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    364
    They lost the spire and most of the roof but the stone parts and the 2 towers survived.
     
  13. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    32,967
    Did the stained glass windows survive? I have read contradictory reports.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  14. geordief Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,029
  15. Quantum Quack Life's a tease... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,317
    What a terrible thing to watch. "A sign perhaps" no doubt was going through many peoples minds as they watched the spire topple.

    I believe you are being quite reasonable to be a tad suspicious.
    From what I have seen
    • The fire started exactly where the maximum fire damage and speed could happen. ( according to reports here)
    • It was started directly under the spire ( all timber ) and one of the greater symbols of the church. ( according to reports here)
    • There was no fire prevention equipment installed.
    • A fire could have been deliberately lit and disguised as an accident very easily. A little kindling , a frayed wire or two....
    • The current anarchist turmoil (yellow vest) and the recent riots using the Churches restoration as an excuse.
    • The timing was perfect for maximum effect.
    • Recent angst about sexual abuse by the clergy of the Catholic church.

    yep. every reason to be suspicious or at least ask the question IMO:

    Was the fire deliberately lit, disguised as an accident, or was it purely an accident?

    I am sure the French authorities are seriously looking into the possibility given the rise in global extremism and recent French terrorist and yellow shirt issues.

    Could it have been spontaneous due to heat build up in the attic?
     
  16. Quantum Quack Life's a tease... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,317
    Regarding the spate of Catholic church ...uhm issues this was posted to the Conversation today.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    so yeah there is a possibility that Notre Dam inferno may have been a part of a global push against Catholics...
    either by conspiracy, or by copy cat inspiration.
     
  17. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,498
    i have been wondering how many undocumented illegal immigrants are parading as yellow jackets trying to bring anarchy to France.


    setting fire to a foreign motor-vehicle stock pile import yard ? that's french !
    setting fire to private motor vehicles ? that doesn't seem french at all !

    spray painting the Arc de Triomphe ? that doesn't seem very French either.

    attaching iconography to your terrorism helps polarise material aspects of social cohesion.
    this undermines the social interaction of religious tolerance
     
  18. Quantum Quack Life's a tease... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,317
    In 1986, Reynald Secher argued that the actions of the French republican government during the revolt in the Vendée (1793–1796), a popular mostly Catholic uprising against the anti-clerical Republican government during the French Revolution was the first modern genocide.[152]
    Secher's claims caused a minor uproar in France and mainstream authorities rejected Secher's claims.[153][154] Timothy Tackett countered that "the Vendée was a tragic civil war with endless horrors committed by both sides—initiated, in fact, by the rebels themselves.
    The Vendeans were no more blameless than were the republicans. The use of the word genocide is wholly inaccurate and inappropriate."[155] However, historians Frank Chalk and Kurt Jonassohn consider the Vendée a case of genocide.[156]
    Historian Pierre Chaunu called the Vendée the first ideological genocide.[157] Adam Jones estimates that 150,000 Vendeans died in what he also considers a genocide.
    src : wiki

    French revolution - genocide (?) against a rebellion against anti-clerical policy of the new Government.

    Now that is France as well...

    I think it is a stretch to seriously consider undocumented migrants as being yellow vest protesters.

    More likely alt- right extreme nationalism at the core with anarchy as the their agenda.

    Potentially to bring down the Macron Government in favor of Marine Le Pen of the National Rally party formally known as the National front.

    Just thoughts....
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2019
  19. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,498
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Revolution
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huguenots#Wars_of_religion


     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2019
    Quantum Quack likes this.
  20. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,498
    this has crossed my mind while watching the news.

    anarchy would be their short term goal as a means to install their military government as a dictator in a war like setting.

    it is one of the most common attempted methods to over throw democracy.

    political alt-right who mingle with conservatives employ this as a policy to gradually hand themselves more and more absolute legal power over the citizens.
    you see it being rolled out in right wing politics constantly.

    .. deny the democracy, label it socialist, then hand the minority all the power.
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2019
    Quantum Quack likes this.
  21. Quantum Quack Life's a tease... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,317
    I would not be surprised if more Catholic churches are attacked before Easter is over.
    5 so far have made the news this week. Starting with Notre Dam.
     
  22. Quantum Quack Life's a tease... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,317
    Also I would be very confident that Law enforcement would be diving deep into the Notre Dam restoration contractors affiliations and associations with the alt right of France and may find a money trail running all the way to Sri Lanka.
     
  23. Tiassa Let us not launch the boat ... Staff Member

    Messages:
    35,891
    It's true my suspicion wondered after alt-right provocation rising out of the French unrest; the big doubt is a similar disbelief as my feelings about insurance and a workplace accident; it seems an incredibly difficult task to be undertaken for the sake of lulz.
     

Share This Page