# Science stories of the week

Discussion in 'General Science & Technology' started by wegs, Jan 31, 2021.

1. ### wegsMatter and Pixie DustValued Senior Member

Messages:
8,814
No apologies needed.

Is it safe to say that gravity seems stronger than it's given credit for, because it's always attractive?

I guess what stumps me a bit is suppose you're laying down under an apple tree, and apples begin falling from the tree, landing on your head. Wouldn't it seem that gravity (at that very moment) isn't weak at all? We tend to take gravity for granted in every day life, because we don't ''feel it.'' I guess what I'm asking is how can gravity be such a fundamental force, yet weak?

3. ### SeattleValued Senior Member

Messages:
8,283
A fly can walk across the ceiling without being pulled off.

The Earth is huge and is pulling your arm down but it doesn't take much effort/energy on your part to simply bend your elbow and counteract all that gravity.

wegs likes this.

5. ### exchemistValued Senior Member

Messages:
11,586
Being fundamental isn't a question of strength, it's a question of whether something can be explained in terms of something else or not. And gravitation can't. It just is what it is, so far as we know at the moment. That's what we mean by fundamental.

7. ### geordiefValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,938
Maybe it is weak but it is everywhere.

Tortoise and the hare ?

8. ### James RJust this guy, you know?Staff Member

Messages:
37,799
One way to compare the relative strengths of forces is to see how different forces act on the same objects.

Consider, for example, the electric force between two electrons, separated by 1 metre. The force is $2.3\times 10^{-28}$ Newton, which is a small force.

But compare the force of gravity between the two electrons at the same separation. That force is $5.5 \times 10^{-71}$ Newton.

In other words, for this example, the electric force is about $10^{42}$ times strong than the gravitational force.

That's 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times stronger.

9. ### geordiefValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,938
Yeah, but gravity says to electro -magnetism "Is that all you got? See you around"

10. ### wegsMatter and Pixie DustValued Senior Member

Messages:
8,814
Okay, when you compare the math equations, it's the weakest, but in terms of importance (because of its incredible range/reach), it should be considered the strongest, no? It's the most strongly present force in our lives, every single day. (Even though we can't detect it.)
And all things considered, gravity is inevitable.

11. ### exchemistValued Senior Member

Messages:
11,586
Actually the reach of the electromagnetic force is the same as that of gravitation. Both obey inverse square laws, i.e. if you double the separation between objects, the force falls to 1/2², i.e to 1/4 of what it was before.

The reason for the effect of gravity at vast distance is that, unlike the electrostatic force, it does not get neutralised when objects attracted because of it come together. So it becomes cumulative.

If you could somehow get a mass of electrons together, on their own, that had the same mass as the earth, the electrostatic force they would exert on charged objects in space would be immense, far greater than gravity. But you can't do that, because such a collection of electrons would firstly fly apart under their colossal mutual repulsion, and even if that could be prevented, it would strip protons from everywhere around in space until it was largely neutralised by them. The same sort of thing applies to the other fundamental interactions too.

But not to gravity, which is why it alone can accumulate large amounts of matter together and thereby magnify its "weak" influence until it outstrips everything else.

12. ### Michael 345New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldlValued Senior Member

Messages:
12,947
I get that

But somewhere out there the inverse square law breaks down to a Planck Length

Soooo do you speculate there is a space (I'm thinking middleish between galaxies) where there is no Gravity

13. ### exchemistValued Senior Member

Messages:
11,586
Planck length remains a speculative theoretical concept, so far as I am aware, with no observable effects.

14. ### wegsMatter and Pixie DustValued Senior Member

Messages:
8,814
Thank you for explaining further. I guess what I'm getting at is that it just seems comparing gravity to the other forces, is like comparing apples to watermelons. I'm now understanding why gravity is considered the weakest of the forces, but the forces themselves don't seem entirely comparable?

Messages:
8,814
16. ### SeattleValued Senior Member

Messages:
8,283
They don't need to be comparable. They need to be forces and they need to be describable and when two are called the strong force and the weak force this brings forth the comment that gravity is the weakest especially in that it has a small role to play in particle physics where the standard model of the 4 fundamental forces comes from in the first place.

17. ### RainbowSingularityValued Senior Member

Messages:
7,392
feeding-seaweed-cattle-could-help-curb-climate-change

im not sure seaweed can properly digest cattle

it would be more beneficial to feed humans seaweed & allow cattle to die out as a domesticated stock animal

if we look at the carbon transfer
you still need to grow the seaweed that will be eaten by th cattle
what happens to the paddocks of grass where the cattle live ?
over nitrating the cattle which then poops into the ground, then rns off
you would still need to have capture process i to re-capture the excess nitrates

the beef industry need to be reduced in size
did we see the beef industry out campaigning to block driver less taxis ?
nope
did they campaign against that ? nope

beef farming has seen its day
meat eating is old world
birds no problem
cattle = huge problem
like driving old cars that are wasteful on fuel and produce lots of pollution
red meat farming is too high in methane & excess resources to produce it

it would be fine if they were open grazing o massively huge pastures hundreds and thousands of square kilometers wide
but hats not how money works
and thats not how greed drives human economics

its just a fact of human evolution and the terrible pollution and climate change human civilization has cast upon the world

cattle farmers should switch to mushrooms and turkeys & small beef production organic etc

Last edited: Mar 18, 2021
18. ### exchemistValued Senior Member

Messages:
11,586
This is very interesting. I see from the article that CHBr₃ does however have potential to be an ozone-depleting compound, so they will need to assure themselves about that before implementing this commercially. However since it seems to be short-lived in the atmosphere, it may not be an issue. The great thing about this is that it makes the animals convert food more efficiently as well, so there is a commercial incentive for the farmer to use it, apart from its beneficial effect on methane emissions.

One just hopes there is enough red seaweed to go round.

wegs likes this.

Messages:
8,814

Messages:
8,283
21. ### wegsMatter and Pixie DustValued Senior Member

Messages:
8,814
lol Oh you.

Well, at least you learned something about moths, today.

Messages:
8,283
That's true!

23. ### wegsMatter and Pixie DustValued Senior Member

Messages:
8,814
Last edited: Apr 24, 2021