Space is made of ?

Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by Billybs, Oct 3, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 69 years old Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,377
    Sometimes?? Seriously ALL the time SCIENTISTS (not science) expect a explanation which makes sense and backed up with evidence from testing and/or step by step details of the thought processes

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,365
    Your perspective of space is wrong. Space is permittive of all dynamical movement by all forms of energy and matter. Space is a collection of "fields".

    BillyBs said,
    a) Space is glass, a transparent solid.

    BUT,
    By your argument space could be concrete because muons can pass right through concrete. Therefore space is concrete??? Wrong!
    Solids only allow movement of subatomic paricles.

    OTOH,
    https://www.insidescience.org/news/spacetime-may-be-slippery-fluid

    b) Space is a transparent fluid. Fluidity allows for movement of both particles and waves.
    The viscosity of spacetime restricts velocity of light to SOL or "c".
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2019
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,692
    How do you imagine planets move through a solid like glass, at speeds of over 10km per second? Or do you contend they do not move?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,692
    I can't imagine why that might be.
     
  8. Billybs Banned Banned

    Messages:
    70
    Have not really though about how they move , I suppose the initial force of the creation of the universe had some involvement .
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2019
  9. Billybs Banned Banned

    Messages:
    70
    Very funny sarcasm .
     
  10. Billybs Banned Banned

    Messages:
    70
    Space is a variation of comparisons , you could compare to concrete if you like but I like my version .
    Just because you don't like my notion , it doesn't mean it isn't true , I've an open mind and I have the freedom to speak my opinion .
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2019
  11. Billybs Banned Banned

    Messages:
    70
    I thought I had presented it well and it was quite kind of me to care about presenting a different version than the standard models .
     
  12. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,365
    So do I, but regardless of the logic used, it must rest on a solid scientific premise.

    Comparisons of transparency has nothing to do with spacetime. It is the physical properties of spacetime which are permittive of movement or not.

    Spacetime is not a solid like glass, it has no physical properties other than having fluid properties, a requirement for transmission of a large range of wave functions.
     
  13. Billybs Banned Banned

    Messages:
    70
    I hate comparisons but sometimes that is all we've got to think with sometimes . I think space itself is made of no thing but contains things such as the "glass" comparative I mentioned that is , could be, an assumed ether that emitted light propagates through .
     
  14. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 69 years old Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,377
    You have thought wrong in every post you have made in this thread

    I am reposting a previous post. Please re-read as I have highlighted what I think you should concentrate on and while OK to give yourself a pat on the back for being kind. Science would prefer sensibility

    Sometimes?? Seriously ALL the time SCIENTISTS (not science) expect a explanation which makes sense and backed up with evidence from testing and/or step by step details of the thought processes

    So having re-read care to try again about what space is?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  15. Billybs Banned Banned

    Messages:
    70
    Well I can only share my thoughts in my own way because my brain doesn't work the same as your brain as no two brains are alike . Before I thought about this I'd not really thought about presentation , that doesn't seem to difficult thought . I will get back to you later on , on this subject . I shall think how to present the argument better .
     
  16. spidergoat Liddle' Dick Tater Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    53,924
    Uninformed opinions on physics are useless and mock the serious task of science.
     
  17. Billybs Banned Banned

    Messages:
    70
    Interesting but I suspect more bs science from you in the fact that you haven't mentioned any physics or given proof of any physics. Are you suggesting there couldn't be an existence of a type of Higg's field?
     
  18. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,692
    Right, well, I submit that the fact we observe them to move, very fast but each at a different speed, must mean that space is not a solid medium such as glass.

    So that, I think disposes of your original question.
     
  19. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,692
    I note the references to repeated bs.

    Just tell me, is it by any chance your opinion that QM is poop?
     
  20. Billybs Banned Banned

    Messages:
    70
    No , quantum mechanics is not as you put it "poop". It is perhaps written in a way that people can't always understand but some science minded type people can understand. Just read any Wiki article and it isn't understandable to ordinary folk who perhaps just want look something up. Then of course there is the type of " pop science" videos on YouTube etc which might be easy to understand but not necessarily science facts as wiki tries to project.
     
  21. spidergoat Liddle' Dick Tater Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    53,924
    No.
     
  22. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,692
    Good, always useful with a weirdo to find out the extent of the weirdness.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    So, what's all this rubbish about glass, then? I presume from your previous reply to me that you don't actually mean glass in the sense of solid vitreous SiO2, but rather some sort of tenuous aether. Would that be right?
     
  23. Billybs Banned Banned

    Messages:
    70
    I think you understand what I am saying .

    Additionally added , consider walking , we ourselves traverse through space .
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2019
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page