The first experimental measurement of God; to a 2-decimal point accuracy

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by George E Hammond, Jan 16, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,853
    Hallelujah for that


    YouTube

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!




    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2022
    sideshowbob likes this.
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    Now that: –

    The first experimental measurement of God; To a 2 decimal point accuracy

    Has been achieved – maybe someone should tell these people about it – they call themselves "Christian Scientists"
    : –

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Turns out Mary Baker Eddy actually knew what she was talking about!

    George

     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    Come to think of it, don't they publish a well known daily newspaper called: "The Christian Science Monitor" – maybe I could talk to one of their reporters who might publish an article in the Monitor about the discovery.... hmm ...?

    George
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. kx000 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,073
    my religion is both spirit and science.
     
  8. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    37,550
    That really ought to suggest something to you. If you're the odd scientist out, it's always a possibility that you're not the genius after all, but some of the other ones are instead. [Cue "but they all laughed at Galileo"...]
     
  9. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,473
    The Christian Science Monitor is a serious newspaper: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/christian-science-monitor/

    If they publish an article about you, it will be to ridicule you. I would not expose yourself to that if I were you. Though it is more likely they would decline to get involved with you at all.
     
    sideshowbob likes this.
  10. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    I don't plan to give anyone a choice. Galileo didn't, neither did Newton, or Einstein – and neither will Hammond.
    I'm holding a royal straight flush in Spades in this Poker game – it's
    anti-up or fold – since I have called !

    George
     
  11. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    And Postscript: – if I have to go all the way to the Princeton Institute for Advanced Study, where there are some real scientists, for a summary judgment, I will !

    George


     
  12. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,419
    If you haven't convinced a large portion of this forum, will you say a large portion of these forums members are just dumb? (you haven't convinced me BTW but that's kinda' besides...)
     
  13. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    37,550
    Dunning Kruger strikes again.
     
  14. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,003
    Yes, you've made that claim repeatedly. But this is a discussion forum, not your blog. People are asking you questions about your "discovery" but you seem unwilling and/or unable to answer. You need to discuss, not just yell.
    I don't dispute that a correlation coefficient can be represented by a cosine. Yes, they are both numbers between zero and one.

    What I am asking is: What angle are you measuring? What instruments are you using?

    Been there, done that. There doesn't appear to be anything on the Internet that matches your claims. So, it is incumbent on you to point us in the direction of something that does.
    And yet you have time to yell the same claims over and over again. You could have answered my question ten times in the time it's taken you to repeatedly yell at me that you don't have time.
     
  15. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    Are you kidding? No one on this forum has any academic credentials in Science. At least no one who has responded to my thread has. I have 2 degrees in theoretical physics, and have been published in the peer-reviewed literature In Psychology – that makes me a polymathic expert in this area.
    ... So what am I doing here you ask? You might as well ask yourself why JC was down on the Dead Sea shore talking to barefoot uneducated fishermen – and became the most famous name in history ! Same story this time – only the guy turns out to be a 21st-century scientist – and is a US citizen and therefore can't be publicly crucified. So guess again !

    George
     
  16. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,003
    Which religion?
     
  17. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,003
    Of course you're the only real Napoleon in the asylum.
     
    Kristoffer likes this.
  18. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    Any of the major world religions – Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Judaism, Buddhism etc.

    George
     
  19. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,003
    You probably mean the Sea of Galilee. Jesus hung around a lot there. The Dead Sea, not so much.
    Comparing yourself to Jesus. I guess we should have seen that coming.
     
    exchemist likes this.
  20. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,003
    I haven't met many Christians who were sympathetic to any of those other religions. I guess when you said that, "anyone who is sympathetic to religion is on the right side of history," you didn't mean Christians.
     
  21. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,473
    You can't give journalists ultimatums like that. If they see a story, they will print that. You have no control over what angle they may choose to pursue.
     
  22. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    Every scientific law ever discovered – is an ultimatum ! F=ma, Guv=kTuv, E=mc*2 and now SPOG, are all ultimatums .
    ... It doesn't matter what journalists say !

    George
     
  23. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,003
    Scientific "laws" do not prescribe. The describe.
     
  24. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,419
    So, am I dumb?

    Are you brave and man enough to say something I would not like?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page