The first experimental measurement of God; to a 2-decimal point accuracy

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by George E Hammond, Jan 16, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,478
    What rot. Scientific "laws" are made-made models, describing how nature seems to operate, that's all. Most of these "laws" are also not obeyed in all circumstances, E=mc² being a case in point.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    It was you, though, that suggested contacting the Christian Science Monitor to get a piece published - and then suggested, absurdly, that you could lay down the law to their journalists.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    You're sharp as a pin psychologically, brilliantly attractive – but SPOG is a scientific question, and you don't know enough science to fill a sticky note!

    George

     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,419
    sideshowbob and Michael 345 like this.
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    What fastidious ignorance !
    The only (scientific) "law that I'm laying down" is that there is a "real God" and that it has been "experimentally measured to a 2 decimal point accuracy".

    George
     
  8. foghorn Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,068
    And yet now confined to forums spouting this same stuff since 2004 and getting nowhere.
    You are full of something in spades, and most people flush that away.

    Still spouting and confined to forums, why is that George?
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2022
    James R likes this.
  9. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    Whaddaru ignorant? The last guy to try and prove there was a real God rode into town on a donkey and ended up getting murdered by a mob.
    ... When Einstein published the general theory of relativity, there was only one guy in the world who could understand it – and that was Hilbert.
    ... When Hammond discovered the world's first scientific proof of God (SPOG) – there isn't even ONE MAN in the world with enough education to understand it!
    THAT'S WHY ! Any other questions?

    George
     
  10. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    The magnetic dipole moment of the electron has been measured to 11 significant figures I don't think there's any question about how the electron magnetic moment "seems to operate"!

    George
     
  11. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,858
    And your reply was, in essence, imatating JC
    The ...... Dead Sea shore .... equalling SciForum and ...... barefoot uneducated fishermen ........ equalling members of SciForum

    Can I deduce from your rantings here in SciForum and the quoted sections of this SciForum post you are hoping (praying?) To also become
    Not going to happen

    Also you might want to consider, the last, pretty much as well known, person (angel) who got a little uppity in heaven was cast out to hell

    {Scientific Question - Was hell already built??????}

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  12. Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,355
    George, by now it should (yet again) be clear to you that no one is buying your bag of rotten milk.
    Do yourself a favour and attempt to figure out why.
    BIG BOLDED LETTERS ABOUT THE GREATNESS THAT IS ME!
    - Kristoffer (someone who, by all accounts, is still rational).
     
  13. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434


    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    YOU HAVE NO SCIENTIFIC CREDENTIALS
    If you do, I'd like to hear them?
    W/O (advanced) scientific credentials
    (which I have) your opinion is nothing
    but wild aggravation, jealousy,
    politics, atheism or some other
    such nonsense.

    Go jump in a lake!

    George
     
  14. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,858
  15. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,419
    If God is real does that also mean Global Warming is real?

     
  16. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    God only controls subjective reality.
    God does not control objective reality.

    Problem is – Man can only see subjective reality, he cannot see objective reality – even though he can take "measurements" of it and prove its there, he cannot actually see it.

    Anything that exists in objective reality
    also exists in subjective reality but it appears to be much larger and much
    faster than it actually is (and therefore more terrifying than it actually is) – including global warming.

    George
     
  17. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,858
    Surely you jest. Is not good omnipotent, literally unlimited power to control EVERYTHING

    Call yourself a religious scientist when you come out with crap like this post I'm replying to

    Sad sad sad

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Alamy
     
  18. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,419
    So, is it possible to summon, Jehovah, just like Al Gore summoned, Satan?
     
  19. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    37,586
    How could you possibly know that? You haven't asked, and it's not as if scientific credentials shout themselves from the rooftops.

    What if the people with scientific credentials here have already written you off as just another internet crank? It's not like they (we?) would lack reasons to do that, based on your performance here so far.

    If you've been doing the rounds of the internet since at least 2004 and you've got nowhere, I'm sure this reaction isn't a new one for you. Maybe there's a reason people with scientific credentials write you off.
    That doesn't follow at all, George. Lots of people have degrees in theoretical physics. Publishing in a psychology journal does precisely nothing to establish your Physics credentials or your Religion credentials or any credentials, other than that the publishers of that journal thought you wrote something worth publishing in their journal.

    How many years ago did that publication happen, George? What have you published since then? Most importantly, has any of this nonsense about proof of God been accepted for publication in a peer reviewed journal? Because that might have some relevance to the current discussion.
    You think you rank up there with Jesus Christ, do you? You expect to go down in history as the guy who proved God ... heh heh ... to 2 decimal places?

    Why don't all the experts acknowledge that you've proved God? Are they all jealous of you, George? Or controlled by evil forces perhaps? Or what?
     
  20. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    37,586
    That's a myth, George. Even if it wasn't, how could you anyone hope to establish that as a fact? What did they do - interview all the guys in the world to check whether they understood it? Which, by the way, only Einstein himself could do, if your story was correct. Since there's no record of Einstein trekking the world interviewing all the guys, I guess that's pretty much Myth Busted, wouldn't you agree?

    Oh wait. Maybe you mean that only one guy in the world (other than Einstein) could understand it ... until a bunch of other guys became aware of it and read it and understood it.

    On the other hand, is it historically the case that there was a time when only Einstein and Hilbert had read Einstein's theory of general relativity? I doubt it.
    How could you possibly know? You haven't asked him. You can't check his name against a database.

    Stop making assumptions that are unsustainable, George. It makes you look like a bit of an idiot, frankly.

    Also, your obsession with credentials makes it look like you think you can prove your point on the basis of your own authority, or something silly like that. If you were really the genius you say you are, you'd know that proofs don't work that way.
    Sounds like you're worried he might have some credentials after all...

    Do you really imagine that people are jealous of your amazing proof that nobody but yourself accepts, George? What gave you such an inflated opinion of yourself?
    You're a climate change denier as well? Chalk up some more nuttiness, I guess.

    You're not making a good first impression, George.
     
  21. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,858
    Seems from the previous few postings I received more reaction from a salesperson I was buying shoes from when I mentioned I had scientifically measured my shoe size to zero decimal places and I was a 10 size

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  22. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,004
    Jesus didn't try to prove there was a real God. He only spoke to people who already believed it.

    And you're no Jesus.
    Nonsense.
    It's interesting that you base your work on measurements made by psychologists - and then you claim that even they don't understand the real implications. If you don't trust their conclusions, why do you trust their measurements?
    I'm still waiting for an answer to my question: How do questionaires about personality types produce angles? What instruments are used to measure those angles?

    Go ahead and take ten minutes to tell me you don't have time to give a five-minute answer.
     
  23. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,004
    I think I would agree with that. Not much of a God, is it?
    Science is an attempt to combine individual subjective perceptions into something approaching an objective perception. Science is necessarily collective, which is why your ranting is not science.

    If nobody understands it but you, it's usually because you're wrong.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page