The first experimental measurement of God; to a 2-decimal point accuracy

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by George E Hammond, Jan 16, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    Bob, for Xsakes, I already answered this question in
    post #664 on page 34 but I will repost it here:

    1. -- The instruments used are "written test questionnaires"

    2.-- The results are "correlation coefficents" to 3 decimal point accuracy.

    3.-- I completly TRUST the Psychologists data -- but what I'm here to report is that because they are not physicists they DON'T RECOGNIZE THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RESULTS --- THEY DON'T REALIZE THAT IT COMES FROM THE CUBIC CLEAVAGE
    OF THE BRAIN
    -- THEREFORE THERE ARE AXIOMATICALLY 13 OF THEM AND THEY ARE THE
    12 Olympian gods of antiquity.... so the top eigenvector must be THE GOD OF THE BIBLE

    4.-- Since a correlation coefficient is the cosine of an angle they simply take the arc-cos (inverse cos) of the correlation coefficents to get an ANGLE and then construct geometric figures of the personalitys types-- and GUESS WHAT ---
    all the figures turn out to be CUBICALLY INTERCORRELATED as shown below (and they can't figure out why, because they are not physicists)
    thus experimentally CONFIRMING my
    "CUBIC BRAIN THEORY
    :


    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    I have explained it a million times. They use 100 question test questionnaires given to 1000 people at a time. They then compute the "correlation coefficients" between the personality types discovered. These are numbers between 0 and 1, such as .71, .55, .42, .35 etc. etc. (All to 2 decimal point accuracy). Meanwhile it is well known that "correlation coefficients" are the COSINE OF AN ANGLE, so they simply take the "inverse-cosine" of the correlations and draw a diagram using the angles. And here are the diagrams that thousands of researchers in thousands and thousands of peer published experiments have found over the last 50 years: –

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Notice the 7 sub-diagrams labeled a,b,c,d,e,f These show that the eigenvector factors are "cubically intercorrelated", which indicates they are coming from a "cubic brain structure" – that is from the CUBIC STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN.

    George
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. foghorn Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,062
    10th May 2001.
    Here is George Hammond talking to a Ph.D. in physics with a dissertation dealing with general relativity.
    The name of the Ph.D. is shown on the page.
    The Ph.D. says:
    George's reply:
    ...

    The Ph.D. Later says:
    http://www2.asa3.org/archive/asa/200105/0081.html
    Worth reading from the start just for the laugh at George's ego trip.
     
    exchemist likes this.
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. foghorn Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,062
    From out of nowhere Hammond just throws in his own belief in gods and attaches them to these numbers.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,003
    So how do you get from questionnaires to numbers? Can you give us an example of the questions?
    In post #664 you said, "They then compute the "correlation coefficients" between the personality types discovered."

    How? How, specifically, are the correlation coefficients dervived from the questionaires?
    Why? Real scientists try to replicate results.
    Well, neither do any other physicists.
    Oh, we're not doing that any more. We're past that. The brain is not a cube.
    Non sequitur. And non sequitur. And nothing axiomatic about it.

    Show your logic, step by step.
    You keep confusing "can be" a cosine with "is" a cosine. I'm asking you how you decide that in this case an angle derives from a questionnaire.

    There's a huge gap in your logic, which is why nobody understand but you.

    Added by edit:

    But I like the "for Xsakes". I'm going to remember that.
     
    foghorn likes this.
  8. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,467
    Golly, so George Hammond (MS Physics) [ but not PhD] has been off his trolley for over 20 years, and has not progressed one iota in all that time.

     
  9. foghorn Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,062
    Well, he is now using coloured text and larger font sizes

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    James R likes this.
  10. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,846
    Where is the linkage? Please show your workings between 13 OF THEM AND THEY ARE 12 Olympian gods

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


     
  11. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,846
    Isn't X used for the unknown?

    Thought had been discovered but can't remember by whom

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  12. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    Okay, let me quote the relevant part of the exchange: –

    > Dear Mr. Hammond -
    > I received your "scientific proof of God" on the ASA list. Your
    > statement '"Gravity" is the ultimate cause of God' is enough to show
    > that the "God" of whom you are speaking cannot be the God of the Bible,
    > the God of whom Christianity speaks. That God is the ultimate cause of
    > all things (which is the basic meaning of the traditional doctrine of
    > _creatio ex nihilo_) and thus cannot be caused by gravity or anything
    > else.

    George's reply:
    [Hammond]
    Wrong. This is an amateur objection which turns out to be patently false. It is caused by the fact that you have little or no understanding of what the theory actually says or means....

    ...

    The Ph.D. Later says:
    > Since you seem to place a good deal of stock in credentials, I
    > should perhaps preface the next comment by saying that I received my
    > Ph.D. in physics with a dissertation dealing with general relativity.


    [GE Hammond MS physics 4/5/22]
    Listen, I was in a physics PhD program studying relativity and actually passed the qualifying examination for a PhD but it didn't feel like spending a year doing a PhD thesis so I left the program looking for something more interesting – – AND I FOUND IT – – THE SPOG!!

    This guy does not understand the difference between: –

    1. – The Big Bang creation of physical reality

    2. – The Biblical creation (Genesis) of HUMAN
    SUBJECTIVE REALITY – – and neither do you !

    Genesis describes the advent of the human mind (human reality) about 1 million years ago. The Big Bang explains the advent of physical reality about 15 Billion years ago.

    These are 2 different things, and this PhD in physics is TOTALLY UNAWARE OF IT – – AND SO ARE YOU !!

    George
     
  13. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,467
    Ah yes. That does seem to go with the territory.........
     
  14. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    Dear Foghorn (BTW I live on Hyannis harbor and hear the Nantucket ferry foghorn 3 times a day) – – anyway I wanted to ask you or anyone else reading this if they have any idea where the: –

    ASA discussion list "SOC/PSYC" is located on the Internet today? ASA stands for "American Sociological Association".

    BTW that physicist named "George Murphy" I was talking to might have been the guy that discovered Deuterium !

    George

     
  15. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,227
    George M Murphy, the CO-discoverer of deuterium, had his obituary posted in Physics Today in March 1969. So probably not, if your conversation took place in 2001.
     
  16. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,846
  17. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    Roger that –there are probably more George Murphy's in the world than George Hammond's !

    GH
     
  18. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,846
    Hope there are less crazy George Murphys than crazy George Hammonds

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  19. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,846
    I have come to the conclusion George is, for me, no longer fun

    George is the text equivalent of the audio version of this



    [GE Hammond MS physics] kzzzz
    [GE Hammond MS physics] kzzzz
    GE Hammond MS physics] kzzzz
    [GE Hammond MS physics] kzzzz

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  20. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,003
    I was thinking X as in Xmas - i.e. Greek letter X (chi), first letter of Christ.
     
  21. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,003
    Everybody is unaware of it because it isn't true. Genesis describes the advent of everything from humanity back to the stars and light - about 6 thousand years ago.
     
    foghorn likes this.
  22. foghorn Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,062
    George will self bump up this thread on the'' recent posts'' page when it nears the bottom of that list. The ego is strong in this one.
     
  23. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    Okay, let me dumb it down for you: – –


    Big Bang = Creation of Universe
    Genesis = Creation of Man

    Anyone who can't figure that out in this day and age is simply ignorant ! Frankly, modern Science is getting fed up with people screwing around with religion. All humanity is facing existential threats. It's time we all got on the same page religion wise!
    ... $50,000,000 over 50 years of global Psychometry research with the aid of modern physics, has now discovered and proven and measured the world's first scientific proof of God.

    God is an "Einsteinian curvature
    of subjective spacetime reality"


    ... It proves that "the God of the Bible" is a universal human mental phenomenon caused by the "human growth curve deficit" and is independent of race, religion, nationality, gender, or genetics. And it proves the above statement is true.

    It's a Brave New World – Get used to it !

    George

     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page