# The first experimental measurement of God; to a 2-decimal point accuracy

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by George E Hammond, Jan 16, 2022.

Not open for further replies.
1. ### George E HammondRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
434
[GE Hammond MS physics]
post #664 on page 34 but I will repost it here:

1. -- The instruments used are "written test questionnaires"

2.-- The results are "correlation coefficents" to 3 decimal point accuracy.

3.-- I completly TRUST the Psychologists data -- but what I'm here to report is that because they are not physicists they DON'T RECOGNIZE THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RESULTS --- THEY DON'T REALIZE THAT IT COMES FROM THE CUBIC CLEAVAGE
OF THE BRAIN
-- THEREFORE THERE ARE AXIOMATICALLY 13 OF THEM AND THEY ARE THE
12 Olympian gods of antiquity.... so the top eigenvector must be THE GOD OF THE BIBLE

4.-- Since a correlation coefficient is the cosine of an angle they simply take the arc-cos (inverse cos) of the correlation coefficents to get an ANGLE and then construct geometric figures of the personalitys types-- and GUESS WHAT ---
all the figures turn out to be CUBICALLY INTERCORRELATED as shown below (and they can't figure out why, because they are not physicists)
thus experimentally CONFIRMING my
"CUBIC BRAIN THEORY
:

[GE Hammond MS physics]
I have explained it a million times. They use 100 question test questionnaires given to 1000 people at a time. They then compute the "correlation coefficients" between the personality types discovered. These are numbers between 0 and 1, such as .71, .55, .42, .35 etc. etc. (All to 2 decimal point accuracy). Meanwhile it is well known that "correlation coefficients" are the COSINE OF AN ANGLE, so they simply take the "inverse-cosine" of the correlations and draw a diagram using the angles. And here are the diagrams that thousands of researchers in thousands and thousands of peer published experiments have found over the last 50 years: –

Notice the 7 sub-diagrams labeled a,b,c,d,e,f These show that the eigenvector factors are "cubically intercorrelated", which indicates they are coming from a "cubic brain structure" – that is from the CUBIC STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN.

George

3. ### foghornValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,062
10th May 2001.
Here is George Hammond talking to a Ph.D. in physics with a dissertation dealing with general relativity.
The name of the Ph.D. is shown on the page.
The Ph.D. says:
...

The Ph.D. Later says:
http://www2.asa3.org/archive/asa/200105/0081.html
Worth reading from the start just for the laugh at George's ego trip.

exchemist likes this.

5. ### foghornValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,062
From out of nowhere Hammond just throws in his own belief in gods and attaches them to these numbers.

7. ### sideshowbobSorry, wrong number.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
7,003
So how do you get from questionnaires to numbers? Can you give us an example of the questions?
In post #664 you said, "They then compute the "correlation coefficients" between the personality types discovered."

How? How, specifically, are the correlation coefficients dervived from the questionaires?
Why? Real scientists try to replicate results.
Well, neither do any other physicists.
Oh, we're not doing that any more. We're past that. The brain is not a cube.
Non sequitur. And non sequitur. And nothing axiomatic about it.

Show your logic, step by step.
You keep confusing "can be" a cosine with "is" a cosine. I'm asking you how you decide that in this case an angle derives from a questionnaire.

There's a huge gap in your logic, which is why nobody understand but you.

But I like the "for Xsakes". I'm going to remember that.

foghorn likes this.
8. ### exchemistValued Senior Member

Messages:
11,467
Golly, so George Hammond (MS Physics) [ but not PhD] has been off his trolley for over 20 years, and has not progressed one iota in all that time.

9. ### foghornValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,062
Well, he is now using coloured text and larger font sizes

James R likes this.
10. ### Michael 345New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldlValued Senior Member

Messages:
12,846
Where is the linkage? Please show your workings between 13 OF THEM AND THEY ARE 12 Olympian gods

11. ### Michael 345New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldlValued Senior Member

Messages:
12,846
Isn't X used for the unknown?

Thought had been discovered but can't remember by whom

12. ### George E HammondRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
434
[GE Hammond MS physics]
Okay, let me quote the relevant part of the exchange: –

> Dear Mr. Hammond -
> I received your "scientific proof of God" on the ASA list. Your
> statement '"Gravity" is the ultimate cause of God' is enough to show
> that the "God" of whom you are speaking cannot be the God of the Bible,
> the God of whom Christianity speaks. That God is the ultimate cause of
> all things (which is the basic meaning of the traditional doctrine of
> _creatio ex nihilo_) and thus cannot be caused by gravity or anything
> else.

[Hammond]
Wrong. This is an amateur objection which turns out to be patently false. It is caused by the fact that you have little or no understanding of what the theory actually says or means....

...

The Ph.D. Later says:
> Since you seem to place a good deal of stock in credentials, I
> should perhaps preface the next comment by saying that I received my
> Ph.D. in physics with a dissertation dealing with general relativity.

[GE Hammond MS physics 4/5/22]
Listen, I was in a physics PhD program studying relativity and actually passed the qualifying examination for a PhD but it didn't feel like spending a year doing a PhD thesis so I left the program looking for something more interesting – – AND I FOUND IT – – THE SPOG!!

This guy does not understand the difference between: –

1. – The Big Bang creation of physical reality

2. – The Biblical creation (Genesis) of HUMAN
SUBJECTIVE REALITY – – and neither do you !

Genesis describes the advent of the human mind (human reality) about 1 million years ago. The Big Bang explains the advent of physical reality about 15 Billion years ago.

These are 2 different things, and this PhD in physics is TOTALLY UNAWARE OF IT – – AND SO ARE YOU !!

George

13. ### exchemistValued Senior Member

Messages:
11,467
Ah yes. That does seem to go with the territory.........

14. ### George E HammondRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
434
[GE Hammond MS physics]
Dear Foghorn (BTW I live on Hyannis harbor and hear the Nantucket ferry foghorn 3 times a day) – – anyway I wanted to ask you or anyone else reading this if they have any idea where the: –

ASA discussion list "SOC/PSYC" is located on the Internet today? ASA stands for "American Sociological Association".

BTW that physicist named "George Murphy" I was talking to might have been the guy that discovered Deuterium !

George

15. ### DywyddyrPenguinaciously duckalicious.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
19,227
George M Murphy, the CO-discoverer of deuterium, had his obituary posted in Physics Today in March 1969. So probably not, if your conversation took place in 2001.

Messages:
12,846
17. ### George E HammondRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
434
[GE Hammond MS physics]
Roger that –there are probably more George Murphy's in the world than George Hammond's !

GH

18. ### Michael 345New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldlValued Senior Member

Messages:
12,846
Hope there are less crazy George Murphys than crazy George Hammonds

19. ### Michael 345New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldlValued Senior Member

Messages:
12,846
I have come to the conclusion George is, for me, no longer fun

George is the text equivalent of the audio version of this

[GE Hammond MS physics] kzzzz
[GE Hammond MS physics] kzzzz
GE Hammond MS physics] kzzzz
[GE Hammond MS physics] kzzzz

20. ### sideshowbobSorry, wrong number.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
7,003
I was thinking X as in Xmas - i.e. Greek letter X (chi), first letter of Christ.

21. ### sideshowbobSorry, wrong number.Valued Senior Member

Messages:
7,003
Everybody is unaware of it because it isn't true. Genesis describes the advent of everything from humanity back to the stars and light - about 6 thousand years ago.

foghorn likes this.
22. ### foghornValued Senior Member

Messages:
1,062
George will self bump up this thread on the'' recent posts'' page when it nears the bottom of that list. The ego is strong in this one.

23. ### George E HammondRegistered Senior Member

Messages:
434
[GE Hammond MS physics]
Okay, let me dumb it down for you: – –

Big Bang = Creation of Universe
Genesis = Creation of Man

Anyone who can't figure that out in this day and age is simply ignorant ! Frankly, modern Science is getting fed up with people screwing around with religion. All humanity is facing existential threats. It's time we all got on the same page religion wise!
... \$50,000,000 over 50 years of global Psychometry research with the aid of modern physics, has now discovered and proven and measured the world's first scientific proof of God.

God is an "Einsteinian curvature
of subjective spacetime reality"

... It proves that "the God of the Bible" is a universal human mental phenomenon caused by the "human growth curve deficit" and is independent of race, religion, nationality, gender, or genetics. And it proves the above statement is true.

It's a Brave New World – Get used to it !

George