The first experimental measurement of God; to a 2-decimal point accuracy

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by George E Hammond, Jan 16, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,355
    I still don't want the YouTube algorithms to think I want to watch religious pseudoscience, so no thanks.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    Hey dude – dummy up already – Michelangelo
    painted a picture of God on the Sistine
    Chapel ceiling 500 years ago –
    we know what he looks like !

    The challenge is to prove (scientifically) that
    He REALLY EXISTS.

    Fortunately HAMMOND has now done that
    and it's called the SPOG.

    George
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    If you stopped wearing ice skates they
    probably wouldn't notice you.

    George
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Motor Daddy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,425
    He?

    God is not a "He." God is a SPIRIT that rides in those that believe.

    You think God is some dude in the sky that collects dead souls and forces them to be there for eternity?

    What if the soul doesn't want to be in Heaven any longer?

    What temperature is it in Heaven?

    Is it always dark in Heaven?

    What do the dead souls do in Heaven, perform God's slave labor?

    Do you get on your knees and talk to God every night before you go to sleep? Does HE answer you back? Have you discussed that with a mental professional?

    Why does God create Storms and Tornadoes to kill people and save a little dog? Does HE like dogs more than people?

    So many questions and so few answers.

    If you talk to God and he answers you back you should seek professional psychiatric help!
     
  8. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    It's not your job to worry about God.
    I'll take care of it.

    George
     
  9. Motor Daddy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,425
    Are you gonna have a talk with HIM tonight before you go to sleep?

    Could you ask him to stop killing so many people with wildfires, tornadoes, hurricanes etc??

    Could you ask him why he collects dead souls and makes them stay in Heaven for eternity?

    Ask him what happens when someone wants out of Heaven?

    Ask him if it's 72 degrees there, and what regulates the temperature in Heaven?

    Ask him how you turn on the lights.

    Ask him if people are forced to work, or they just hang out forever doing nothing?

    Ask him if a 107 year old lady dies and goes to Heaven if she has to spend eternity in pain as a 107 year old?

    Let me know what his answers are, K?
     
  10. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434

    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    Hey Motormouth – don't puke out your Richard Dawkins
    "God Delusion" rap on Sciforums. This forum is for
    straight as a ruler scientists – the leadership of the world,
    and posting a pseudo-psycho meltdown act here is beyond
    boring.
    Talk straight science or take your GED and go back to
    grinding asymmetric camshafts – where you belong !.

    George
     
  11. Baldeee Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,123
    Ah, yes, the same forum that you considered to be scraping the barrel.
    You're a hoot, Mr.Hammond.
    A narcissistic crank the likes of which we rarely see.
    A psychiatrist's dream patient.
    Anyhoo, it would be nice to think that this site was for "straight as a ruler" scientists, but we're always kind enough to let the likes of you in.
    Please don't outstay your welcome.
    "Leadership of the world"... sure, if it makes you feel better, you poor delusional soul.


    Actually makes for a refreshing change to the pseudoscience garbage that you can't help but regurgitate.
    You first, Mr. Hammond.
    You first.
    At least he'd be doing something useful, unlike the garbage you seem to waste your time raking into a pile.

    Any chance you'll ever get round to addressing the vast number of issues in your "proof"?
    Or will you just keep your head buried in the delusion that it actually does what you think it does?
    Dishonest cranks will do what dishonest cranks do, I guess.
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2022
  12. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    37,550
    As was pointed out to you earlier in the thread, our subjective perception of time seems to move slower when we are younger, not faster. This could be because a given time period when we're young makes up a greater percentage of our total life span to date.

    Your claims about "magnification" and time moving faster are so non-specific and unquantified that they are useless, anyway.
    No. Curvature has a very specific definition in relativity.
    How did you measure the 15% "growth stunting", exactly? What did you measure? And to what did you compare it?
    Your God doesn't sound powerful to me. He reduces to a number, does he not?
    It sounds like you're just appropriating Einstein's work and hoping that some of his famous gloss might rub off onto you.

    You still haven't answered my questions about what the manifold of subjective reality actually involves. And have you shown mathematically that it appears "magnified and speeded up", and why that is the case? Where can I find your mathematical description?
    I think I get it. Your God can be described by a single number, R.

    What is K in your equation for R? How are K and g determined?

    Why do you call the number R "God"? That seems like a big word for a very limited concept.
    Really? Got any references for that figure?
    Academic credentials are not a pre-requisite for being a sciforums administrator.

    My scientific credentials are irrelevant to this discussion, anyway. So are yours. If it makes it easier for you, you are free to assume that I have better scientific credentials than you do.
    As far as I can tell, you're telling us that your conception of God reduces to a single number.

    Your God doesn't really match any of the gods of mainstream religions, does it? It's a small, unimportant sort of God.

    Do you worship your God? (I think it would be strange if you did, but I thought I'd ask, just in case.)
     
  13. Motor Daddy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,425

    The only mouth here spewing God delusions is yours.

    You are mentally ill if you talk to your sky daddy and you hear his voice in your head responding to you.

    You are like a 5 year old with a little imaginary friend. The typical response to that is that the parents have the kid mentally evaluated.

    You should seek professional help, and stop talking to imaginary creatures in the sky.

     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 6, 2022
  14. foghorn Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,062
    George considers himself as a champion for Creationists.

    From: George Hammond
    Date: Mon May 28 2001

    Both quotes from:

    http://www2.asa3.org/archive/asa/200105/0308.html
     
  15. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    37,550
    Does Hammond realise that even if, by some miracle, his proof was valid, that would do nothing at all to prove Creationism or to disprove evolution? I suspect not.
     
  16. Baldeee Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,123
    42?
     
    James R likes this.
  17. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,003
    Too bad Gilbert Gottfried died recently. He could have played you.
     
  18. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,003
    Where did you hear that? There are people here who know a things or two about science and there are quite a few of us who can recognize nonsense when we see it. If the forum was restricted to actual scientists, there wouldn't be many members (and they wouldn't have much to do).
     
  19. Baldeee Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,123
    There's always Christopher Lloyd?
    He plays cranks very well.
    And scientists, so maybe that would be to give Mr. Hammond too much credence?
    And Mr. Hammond would have been ejected as soon as his first post was read.
    But this is Sciforums, and we have a zoo to fill, it seems.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    sideshowbob likes this.
  20. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]

    Hammond's SPOG proves that BOTH

    Evolution and Creationism are scientifically
    CORRECT.

    All scientific fact and experiment involves
    1. – Physical reality
    2. – A human "observer"

    So that: –

    Big Bang = creation of physical reality
    Genesis = creation of the "observer"

    Unfortunately – the Big Bang was 14 billion
    years ago – while the creation of the "observer"
    was only about 1 million years ago (Man).

    And academics can't figure out how the "observer"
    "created" the Big Ban – that in fact, the "observer"
    did in fact "existentially" create the Big Bang.

    And if you can't figure that out
    you're not college graduate material
    because the Creationists and
    Fundamentalists, many of whom never
    went to college, CAN figure it out !

    George
     
  21. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,797
    As one who speeks from experience (sinse i didnt graduate 9th grade)… i fully understand you’r theory… an i agree that to much education can be a hindrance to beliefs unless you'r a believer.!!!
     
  22. George E Hammond Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    434
    [GE Hammond MS physics]
    So far, there have been 1158 posts to this thread,
    subtracting 374 of my own that leaves 784 posts
    by others.

    And EVERY ONE OF the 784 POSTS by others
    have been – NEGATIVE, HECKLING, and/or
    RIDICULING the SPOG – except for ONE –
    and that is the last post quoted above , by
    "cluelusshusbund" which was AFFIRMATIVE.

    He was responding to my post in which I
    mentioned that the "Fundamentalists,
    Creationists, and I will now add Evangelicals,
    ALL inherently support and easily understand
    the discovery of the world's first
    Scientific Proof of God (SPOG). And understand
    the fact that the SPOG proves that Creationism
    And Fundamentalism are now SCIENTIFICALLY
    PROVEN TO BE TRUE.


    And here I want to point out to ACADEMIA in no
    uncertain terms – that I personally as well as the
    Creationists and Fundamentalists and
    Evangelicals are unified in our opposition to the
    neo-atheism of Academia including Richard
    Dawkins and others.

    Furthermore in my post #1058 on page 53 I
    suggests that that my (accidental) discovery of
    the world's first Scientific Proof of God (SPOG)
    could easily be evaluated by Academia utilizing
    a scientific panel consisting of: –

    It would take a panel of scientists: –
    1 or 2 physicists
    2 or 3 psychometrists
    1 or 2 neuropsychologists
    1 embryology expert
    a couple of theologians
    (Jewish, Catholic, Lutheran
    at a minimum)
    and others


    And I would strongly suggest to Academia
    that they
    convene (via Zoom) such a panel as soon as possible
    and they might invite someone like Bill Dembski
    while they are at it.


    And I suggest they do so before the Fundamentalists, Creationists, and Evangelicals get wind of the discovery
    of the SPOG.

    There is no doubt now, in view of this discovery, that
    "God, and Religion are going to have to be taught in
    public school "Science classes"" – so get used to it !

    And thank you "cluelusshusbund",
    whoever you are.

    George
     
  23. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,797
    You welcome... an i am known far an wide as the uneducated Genius.!!!
     
    sideshowbob and Baldeee like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page