I didn't "accept" anything. An eyewitness can certainly describe a visually wingless, propulsionless object. So what? The video just proved that such a description is not noteworthy in-and-of-itself - it can describe mundane commercial aircraft under the right conditions. Have you forgotten you've made these baseless assertions before? Well, what say I is: You are wrong when you assert 'it's not an airplane'. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! It doesn't matter if they are credible or not - they're describing something perfectly mundane. If the world's crummiest birdwatcher said "I saw a Robin!" we wouldn't need to analyze whether his account is credible. The video has proven that wingless, propulsionless tic-tacs are well within the mundane.