We never went to the moon.

Discussion in 'Conspiracies' started by Ryndanangnysen, Mar 4, 2015.

  1. Michael 345 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,927
    I'll kick start your extremely extensive investigation with the following link

    http://www.clavius.org/envrad.html
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Ophiolite Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,232
    OK, Fat Freddy, I believe your persistence should be rewarded. It is time for us to come clean. You are absolutely correct. The moon landings were faked.

    However, NASA wanted to be sure that they did as professional a job as possible of faking it. So, in October 1968 a fleet of spacecraft left Earth and headed for the moon. Led by six professional NASA astronauts the working team consisted of two set designers, three cameramen, two artistic directors, a stage manager and a makeup artist (who was having an affair with one of the artistic directors). Despite this enormous effort their were several errors in the faked result. Errors you have so assiduously pointed out to us. Well done.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    327
    Good grief. The Clavius site is a known disinfo site. Look what happens when they have to deal with real questions put forward by real hoax believers.

    Start with reply #18 here.
    http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1118.15

    Also, look at the threads I posted here.
    http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-21#post-3435534


    The only way I could be sure about the levels of space radiation would be to send up my own probe. I know there are sites that tell you what the official figures are but we have no way of knowing whether the data are bogus. Look at the alternative info in reply #1 here.
    http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1147.0
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Michael 345 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,927
    Here I put forward a FAKE way a top level meeting went when NASA found out it could not go to the Moon

    You understand this is a FAKE meeting I made up

    So you should be able to post here how the REAL meeting went through all your contacts yes?

    Lets listen in a top level FAKE NASA meeting - top scientist speaking

    ' Sorry to tell you people after all the hard work you put in building the rockets but (__insert reason here__) stops us sending a man to the Moon

    Yes you at the back with your hand up

    What's that you say?

    Why don't we fake it?

    Brilliant idea

    OK everybody back to work

    We've got a Moon landing to fake
    '

    Prove that meeting didn't take place
     
  8. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,919
    Fat freddy... If you were right they would kill you given on your view they are bent on a cover up. Be careful.
    Alex
     
  9. Michael 345 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,927
    I expect he will dive into research and work really really hard because he has been searching for the truth for so long and now he has a way forward

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  10. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,919
    Yeh if he lives that long.
    Alex
     
  11. RADII Registered Member

    Messages:
    29
    Wait! Who did the catering? You can't tell me NASA came up with Space Ice Cream. That right there would invalidate their claims!
     
  12. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,847
    Then where have the moon rocks come from ?
     
  13. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,734
    Canadian Tire.
     
  14. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,847
    I chuckled ......

    So rubberised rocks ......
     
  15. David C The print that nails this troofer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    129
    Hell, that's news to me, do you have any proof of this?

    What am I missing. You appear to be getting your flimsy butt kicked to death.

    What should I be seeing? I see spam and dumb in equal quantities.


    Well there is another way. There are literally thousands of commercial satellites operating in and around the belts. If the radiation issue had been deliberately minimised, they would be failing in their droves. They aren't. Can you work out the obvious conclusion? The apollohoax thread just seems to be you getting your butt handed to you again. Very odd you keep linking to your spam/banned userids.
     

Share This Page